Skip to main content

Full text of "ERIC EJ696129: Extended Diaper Wearing: Effects on Continence in and out of the Diaper"

See other formats


JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS 


2004 , 37 , 97-100 


NUMBER 1 (spring 2004 ) 


EXTENDED DIAPER WEARING: EEEECTS ON 
CONTINENCE IN AND OUT OE THE DIAPER 

Rachel S. F. Tarbox, W. Larry Williams, and Patrick C. Friman 

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO 


Diaper use is widespread and possibly even increasing across diverse populations in the 
United States, ranging from infants to very old adults. We found no reports of an ex- 
perimental analysis of the effect of wearing diapers on the frequency of urinary accidents 
and the attainment of continence skills (e.g., urinating in the toilet). In this study, we 
used a withdrawal design to evaluate the effect of wearing diapers on daily urinary ac- 
cidents and successful voids for an adult who had been diagnosed with mental retardation. 
Results indicated that wearing diapers increased the rate of accidents and decreased the 
rate of successful voids. Clinical implications of these results are discussed. 

DESCRIPTORS: caregiver training, incontinence, toilet training 


Urinary incontinence causes an array of 
problems ranging from personal embarrass- 
ment to imperiled public health. As just one 
example, incontinence at day-care centers 
can promote the spread of infectious diseases 
(Berk & Friman, 1990). Yet, abundant ex- 
perimental evidence indicates that with skills 
training urinary continence can be estab- 
lished and maintained effectively in diverse 
populations, including infants (Smeets, Lan- 
cioni, Paul, & Oliva, 1985), emotionally dis- 
turbed adolescents (e.g., Friman & Vollmer, 
1995), severely handicapped individuals 
(Azrin & Foxx, 1971), and very old adults 
(Burgio et ah, 1990). A popular cultural and 
commercial trend toward increased diaper 
usage, however, appears to promote conve- 
nience over continence by forestalling (e.g., 
in the young) or even forgoing (e.g., in the 
handicapped or very old) skills training (e.g., 
Goode, 1999; Lancaster, 1990). The con- 
venience for caregivers created through use 
of diapers with those in care is an indisput- 


We thank Deborah Grinager for her assistance with 
the preparation of this article and Jay Summers and 
the staff at the Prevocational Assessment, Training and 
Habilitation Center at the University of Nevada, 
Reno, for their assistance with data collection. 

Address correspondence to Larry Williams, Psy- 
chology Department/296, University of Nevada, 
Reno, Reno, Nevada 89557. 


able benefit, as are any increases in confi- 
dence, mobility, or social participation the 
use of diapers may provide for those who 
wear them. But whether extended diaper use 
produces unwanted behavioral effects has yet 
to be experimentally investigated. For ex- 
ample, does wearing diapers merely capture 
urinary accidents or does it also set the oc- 
casion for their occurrence? More important, 
does wearing diapers promote or impede the 
attainment of out-of-diaper continence 
skills? We address these questions in this ex- 
perimental case study. 

METHOD 

Participant. Ralph, a 29-year-old man 
with mental retardation, lived in a commu- 
nity residential setting for individuals with 
developmental disabilities and attended a vo- 
cational workshop from 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 
p.m. weekdays. Prior to the investigation, 
Ralph was regularly placed in diapers (De- 
pends® adult diapers) at home by residential 
staff and was intermittently placed in diapers 
while at the workshop, depending on staff 
vigilance and inclination. Ralph arrived at 
the workshop in a diaper. This study was 
conducted to determine the effects of diaper 
use on Ralph’s continence and attainment of 
continence skills. 


97 


98 


RACHEL S. F. TARBOX et d. 


Procedure. The study was conducted at 
Ralph’s workshop. During all conditions, 
Ralph was prompted to use the toilet every 
half hour. The prompt consisted of telling 
Ralph “it’s time to go to the bathroom,” and 
gently guiding him to the toilet. Once in the 
bathroom, Ralph independently pulled 
down his pants and underwear (the staff 
took off his diaper when he was wearing 
one) and he sat on the toilet. During the 
diaper condition, Ralph remained in a dia- 
per throughout the day unless an accident 
was detected, whereupon the diaper was 
changed. During the no-diaper condition, 
Ralph’s diaper was removed when he arrived 
at the workshop and replaced when he left 
for home. 

Data collection. Trained staff collected 
data at Ralph’s vocational workshop on the 
daily occurrence of urinary accidents and 
successful voids. An accident was recorded if 
Ralph’s garments (i.e., diaper, underpants, or 
pants) were seen or felt to be wet in any spot 
at the half-hour check. Successful voids were 
defined as seeing or hearing urine contacting 
the toilet during the scheduled toileting op- 
portunities. The time of day that Ralph was 
taken to the toilet was also recorded for the 
purposes of evaluating treatment integrity. 
Treatment integrity data were collected for 
100% of sessions. Treatment integrity was 
assessed by dividing the number of times 
that Ralph was taken to the toilet within 5 
min of the scheduled time per day by the 
total number of scheduled toilet trips per 
day, yielding a mean percentage of integrity 
of 92% across all days (range, 72% to 
100%). Interobserver agreement was as- 
sessed for at least 30% of the toilet trips dur- 
ing each day. Agreement was measured by 
dividing the number of agreements on each 
occurrence of an accident, a successful void, 
and the time of day by the total number of 
agreements plus disagreements, yielding a 
mean percentage of agreement of 100% 
across all days. 


Experimental design. A withdrawal design 
was used to assess the effects of diaper use 
on urinary accidents and successful voids. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

The results shown in Figure 1 suggest that 
wearing a diaper set the occasion for Ralph’s 
urinary accidents. In the diaper condition, 
Ralph had substantially more accidents (Af 
= 1.5 per day) than in the no-diaper con- 
dition {M =0.1 per day). The results also 
suggest that wearing a diaper had a decre- 
mental effect on his using the toilet because, 
in the diaper condition, he used the toilet 
substantially less often {M = 0.5 per day) 
than in the no-diaper condition {M = 1.8 
per day). In addition, increased accidents on 
the 1st day of the second and third no-dia- 
per conditions suggest that when his diaper 
was removed, it took Ralph at least a day to 
recover his continence. 

Although not addressed specifically by 
this study, the results suggest that the diaper 
exerted discriminative control or was an es- 
tablishing operation, or exerted a combina- 
tion of these functions. The reinforcers in- 
volved cannot be identified with certainty, 
but the most plausible candidates appear to 
involve negative reinforcement (e.g., decreas- 
es in the sensation of wetness, social detec- 
tion of accidents, or the effort necessary to 
urinate). In addition to the function of the 
diaper, it is possible that social reinforcement 
played a role in the increase in toilet usage 
in the no-diaper condition. Future research 
could extend these results by addressing 
these issues. 

A potential concern involves fluid intake 
across conditions. Ralph drank two glasses 
of milk a day throughout the study, but no 
record of his water intake was kept. Accord- 
ing to staff and observers, however, milk 
comprised the major portion of his fluid in- 
take. A limitation involves the inclusion of 


DIAPERS AND URINARY INCONTINENCE 


99 




Figure 1 . Number of toileting accidents per day are depicted in the top panel. Number of successful voids 
per day are depicted in the bottom panel. 


only 1 participant, which limits the gener- 
ality of the findings. 

Concerns, limitations, and unanswered 
questions notwithstanding, it seems prudent 
to discuss some clinical implications of the 
results. Incontinence is a problem across 
multiple normal and clinical populations, 
and an increasingly popular solution in- 
volves the use of a diaper-like undergarment. 
In some cases, use of the garments may be 
the only feasible solution, but in others, 
their use, although convenient for caretakers, 
may retard a wearers progress in the attain- 
ment of continence skills. Wet diapers often 
provide a rationale for their own continued 
use (i.e., the fact that they are wet indicates 
the need for their use, as was the case in this 
study). The results here, however, suggest 
that the need for a diaper may be more ac- 
curately determined through use of out-of- 
diaper tests. 


Although the participant in this study was 
an adult with developmental disabilities, the 
results have implications for other popula- 
tions such as normally developing young 
children and very old adults. Market forces 
are promoting increased diaper use for both 
populations, and yet attaining and maintain- 
ing full continence is achievable for virtually 
all nonhandicapped children and many old- 
er, intermittently incontinent adults as well 
(Goode, 1999; Lancaster, 1990). The results 
here suggest the importance of exploring 
whether diaper use instigates accidents or 
forestalls appropriate toileting in these pop- 
ulations. 

REFERENCES 

Azrin, N. H., & Foxx, R. M. (1971). A rapid method 
of toilet training the institutionalized retarded. 
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 89-99. 


100 


RACHEL S. F. TARBOX et d. 


Berk, L. B., & Friman, P. C. (1990). Epidemiologic 
aspects of toilet training. Clinical Pediatrics, 29, 
278-282. 

Burgio, L. D., Engel, B. T., Hawkins, A., McCormick, 
K., Scheve, A., & Jones, L. T. (1990). A staff 
management system for maintaining improve- 
ments in continence with elderly nursing home 
residents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 
111-118. 

Friman, P. C., & Vollmer, D. (1995). Successful use 
of the nocturnal urine alarm for diurnal enuresis. 
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 89—90. 

Goode, E. (1999). Pediatricians renew battle over toilet 
training. New York Times on the Web. Retrieved from 


http://www.nytimes.com/library/nationalscience/ 
01 1299sci-toilettraining.html 
Lancaster, M. M. (1990). Urinary incontinence: Aids 
for management. In R. C. Hanby, J. M. Turnball, 
L. D. Norman, & M. M. Lancaster (Eds.), Al- 
zheimer’s disease: A handbook for caregivers (pp. 
108—115). St. Louis: Mosby. 

Smeets, P. M., Lancioni, G. E., Ball, T. S., & Oliva, 
D. S. (1985). Shaping self-initiated toileting in 
infants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 
303-308. 

Received December 3, 2002 
Final acceptance November 11, 2003 
Action Editor, Richard Smith